Quellenverzeichnis zum Beitrag "10 Jahre Fukushima - 10 Jahre Falschinformation" von Amardeo Sarma und Anna Veronika Wendland, Skeptiker 1/2021, S. 4 - 10.
1 The Asia Foundation: In Face of Disaster, Japanese Citizens and Government Pull from Lessons Learned. https://asiafoundation.org/2011/03/16/in-face-of-disaster-japanese-citizens-and-government-pull-from-lessons-learned/
2 Levi McLaughlin, Oxford Handbooks Online: Religious Responses to the 2011 Tsunami in Japan, https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935420.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935420-e-29
3 CISION: The Untold Story of Japan's Tsunami Refugees, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-untold-story-of-japans-tsunami-refugees-248207501.html
4 UPI: 4 years after Japan earthquake, refugees struggle for housing. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2015/03/11/4-years-after-Japan-earthquake-refugees-struggle-for-housing/9111426090451/
5 OCHA (UN Services for the Coordination of Human Affairs, Relief Web: 4 years after Japan earthquake, refugees struggle for housing, https://reliefweb.int/report/japan/recovery-postponed-long-term-plight-people-displaced-2011-great-east-japan-earthquake
6 The Mainichi, Nearly 60,000 evacuees, 5,623 in temporary housing 7.5 yrs after Tohoku disaster, 11. Sep 2018. https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20180911/p2a/00m/0na/004000c
7 Nippon.com, The State of Recovery in Tōhoku Nine Years after 3/11, 11. März 2020. https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h00670/the-state-of-recovery-in-tohoku-nine-years-after-311.html
8 Science Daily, High rates of PTSD and other mental health problems after great east Japan earthquake, 9. Jan. 2017, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170109113806.htm
9 Harada, N., Shigemura, J., Tanichi, M. et al. Mental health and psychological impacts from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster: a systematic literature review. Disaster and Mil Med 1, 17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0008-x.
10 Orui M, Suzuki Y, Maeda M, Yasumura S. Suicide Rates in Evacuation Areas After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster. Crisis. 2018;39(5):353-363. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000509
11 Yoshitake Takebayashi, Hiroshi Hoshino, Yasuto Kunii, Shin-Ichi Niwa, and Masaharu Maeda Crisis (2020), 41, pp. 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000679.
12 Tokyo Review, The Fukushima Disaster Is Far From Over. https://www.tokyoreview.net/2018/04/fukushima-disaster-not-over/
13 Annals of Global Health, Volume 80, Issue 2, March–April 2014, Pages 108-114, Ongoing Mental Health Concerns in Post-3/11 Japan. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214999614000435
14 Erweiterte Onlineversion dieses Artikels: https://www.oekomoderne.de/zehn-jahre-fukushima-falschinformation
15 Eidgenössisches Nuklearsicherheitsinspektorat ENSI, Fukushima Daiichi. Menschliche und organisatorische Faktoren. Teil 2: Der Ablauf aus Sicht der beteiligten Menschen vor Ort, Brugg 2018, https://www.ensi.ch/de/dokumente/fukushima-daiichi-menschliche-und-organisatorische-faktoren-teil-2/
16 Eidgenössisches Nuklearsicherheitsinspektorat ENSI, Analyse Fukushima 2011. Vertiefende Analyse des Unfalls in Fukushima am 11. März 2011 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der menschlichen und organisatorischen Faktoren, Brugg 2011, https://www.ensi.ch/de/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2011/12/fukushima_analyse.pdf
17 Gesellschaft für Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), Fukushima Daiichi 11. März 2011. Unfallablauf – Radiologische Folgen. 5. Aufl., Köln 2016, https://www.grs.de/5-jahre-fukushima
18 a) Greenpeace 2019, „8 Jahre andauernde Atomkatastrophe von Fukushima“, https://www.greenpeace.de/node/23646
b) Stadt Marburg, 2016: „Am 11. März 2011 kam es infolge des Tohoku-Erdbebens zur bislang größten Atomkatastrophe, als in Fukushima vier von sechs Reaktorblöcken zerstört wurden. Zehntausende Tote und hunderttausende Obdachlose waren zu beklagen“, https://www.marburg.de/portal/meldungen/gedenken-der-opfer-von-fukushima-900000642-23001.html
19 GRS 2016, 28, 39-40; 50-61.
20 Unscear-Bericht « Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami», 2014, http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf
21 Internetseiten der Präfektur Fukushima: http://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal-english/en03-01.html
22 Archiv mit Hinweis auf Tokyo Shimbun. 6 March 2016: https://www.japanfs.org/sp/en/news/archives/news_id035681.htm
23 Thomas, P.; May, J.: Coping after a big nuclear accident (Editorial), Process Safety and Environmental Protection 112 (2017) 1–3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.013
34Dingwall S. et al: Human Health and the Biological Effects of Tritium in Drinking Water: Prudent Policy Through Science – Addressing the ODWAC New Recommendation, Dose Response. 2011; 9(1): 6–31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3057633/
24 Goldberg, J.: Strahlung – ein Spektrum der Angst. Skeptiker 1/2019
25 Waddington, I., Thomas, P.J., Taylor, R.H., Vaughan, G.J., 2017. J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 112, 16–49.
26 Verena Brinks / Oliver Ibert / Anna Veronika Wendland, Beratung unter Stress: Experten in und für Krisen. Working Paper No. 2, Leibniz-Forschungsverbund Krisen einer Globalisierten Welt, Berlin, April 2017], OECD / NEA 2021, Fukushima Daiichi 10 Years on, S. 48-49,
https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_56742/fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-power-plant-accident-ten-years-on
27 Hoeve, J.E., Jacobson, M.Z.: Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, Energy &Environmental Science, 2012, DOI: 10.1039/c2ee22019a
28 Lynas, M.: Why Fukushima death toll projections are based on junk science, 2012, https://www.marklynas.org/2012/07/fukushima-death-tolls-junk-science/
29 WHO: Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami based on a preliminary dose estimation, 2013, ISBN 978 92 4 150513 0.
30 Yamashita, S. et al: Lessons from Fukushima: Latest Findings of Thyroid Cancer After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Thyroid. 2018 Jan;28(1):11-22. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0283. Epub 2017 Dec 1. PMID: 28954584; PMCID: PMC5770131
31 Holger Dambeck, Radioaktives Wasser soll ins Meer abgelassen werden, http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/technik/fukushima-betreiber-will-radioaktives-wasser-ins-meer-ablassen-a-1157727.html
32 Safecast: PART 1: Radioactive water at Fukushima Daiichi: What should be done? https://blog.safecast.org/2018/06/part-1-radioactive-water-at-fukushima-daiichi-what-should-be-done/
33 Canadian Nuclear Safety Committee (CNSC): Tritium in Drinking Water. https://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/resources/health/tritium/tritium-in-drinking-water.cfm
34 Dingwall S. et al: Human Health and the Biological Effects of Tritium in Drinking Water: Prudent Policy Through Science – Addressing the ODWAC New Recommendation, Dose Response. 2011; 9(1): 6–31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3057633/
35 ENSI, 2011 (siehe Endnote 15)
36 Kai Kosowski / Marcus Seidl, External Hazard Coinciding with Small Break LOCA – Thermohydraulic Calculation with System Code ATHLET, in: Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science vol.6 (2020), April 2020, 021107-1 – 021107-9
37 Y. Kozmenkov / M. Jobst / S. Kliem / K. Kosowski / F. Schaefer / P. Wilhelm, The efficiency of sequential accident management measures for a German PWR under prolonged SBO conditions, in: Nuclear Engineering and Design 363 (2020),110663-1 – 110663-11]
38 GRS 2016, 92-97
40 „Deutschlands Energiewende–Ein Gemeinschaftswerk für die Zukunft“, https://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/wp-content/uploads/migration/documents/2011-05-30-abschlussbericht-ethikkommission_property_publicationFile.pdf
41 Kharecha. P.A. Sato, M.: How Energy Choices After Fukushima Impacted Human Health and the Environment. https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/06/17/post-fukushima-energy-japan-germany/
42 Kharecha. P.A. Sato, M.: Implications of energy and CO2 emission changes in Japan and Germany after the Fukushima accident, Energy Policy, Volume 132, September 2019, 647-653 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.057
